Blog

Thursday, May 29, 2008

(Ignite the) Nitro!

Recently, a manager of a popular band dropped some hints that he felt his clients "weren't getting any real coverage" in AP. As I proofread the five-page feature said band were getting, I wondered how much it would actually cost to have the guy's face pushed into a rotary fan. This got me to thinking about current trends in contemporary whining.

Last year, I wrote a four-star review of the last Used album. After the piece ran, I got an e-mail from an indignant reader. She didn't take umbrage with the rating; she just didn't appreciate my comment about how Bert McCracken's vocals were marinating in producer John Feldmann's Pro-Tools consommé. The crowning jewel was when the reader told me to "stick my review up my Hershey Highway." Really.

Now, what am I going to do? Send her a flame mail so vile and pugnacious, I'll end up the next magna cum laude graduate of Lori Drew Friendship Academy? I did nothing. Answering somebody like that is like telling a three-year-old there's no Santa Claus. Pointless.

This reminds me of some allegedly grown-up dudes in bands. You know, the ones who somehow feel defiled, besmirched or trashed over a bad review, as if said missive was issued by one of those creepy polygamous religious sects. Consider Good Charlotte. When longtime GC booster Jonah Bayer savaged their last disc, Good Morning Revival, they were so aghast, some too-cool-for-school whining about the review made it onto to the AIM away message of someone in the Madden camp. In their last AP interview, Joel said something snide about "the bands that your magazine covers," as if his organization had absolutely nothing to do with the massive infiltration of pop music in contemporary punk. I see the ads for their impending tour with Boys Like Girls and Metro Station have them listed in the middle. They've retained the services of paid professionals to spin it as a "co-headlining" tour, but really, I'm sure even Ticketmaster employees are concerned about what their company's take is gonna be at this point. (BTW, my favorite GC song is "Falling Away.")

I recall the time when Mr. Bayer dared to question the veracity of y'alternative darlings Lucero in a review. Bayer, quite the staunch supporter of the band, stated their Nobody's Darlings album simply wasn't up to snuff. This led to the band's indignant drummer to huff and puff all over the band's website, saying how Bayer was full of worm droppings. Bully for you, rubba-nutz! So then in theory, all the positive things JB said about the band in the past had to be discounted as well, right? It wasn't too long afterward when one of their well-scrubbed fans with bifocals, a PBR belt buckle and a Ryan Adams backpiece sent us an email with the subject line "Lucero Drummer Punks Your Reviewer." It should be said that since that review, Bayer and various members of the band have exchanged man-hugs while draining a few glasses together. Hell, they've had big ol' features in the mag since then. Personally, I'll start to care when they write a song as good as the Gun Club's "She's Like Heroin To Me."

My arms are getting tired beating dead horses, so let's switch gears a bit. Let's talk about Fear Before The March Of Flames. An AP reviewer threw their first album, Odd How People Shake, under a bus. You know what they did in retaliation? Not a damn thing. They read the review, considered what was said and carried on doing what they do. They came back with Art Damage, a flamethrower of a disc that mixed screamo sensibilities and genius electronic flourishes. FBTMOF followed that album with The Always Open Mouth, a record that found them redrafting their entire existence with similarly exciting results. When some asshat yelled, "Play the old songs!" during their last gig in Cleveland, I shared some of my best phlegm with the heckler. Dolt.

Time Again's latest, Darker Days, was slagged in these pages, due to its great similarity to American punk icons Rancid. (I've heard them referred to as "Tim Again," a reference to Rancid founder Tim Armstrong's place in their mindset.) I was on the business end of that payback: Singer Daniel Dart sent me over a bottle of Jack Daniels (covered in Time stickers, mind you), wrapped up in some t-shirts and hoodies. He included a note saying although he would've liked to have seen more positive coverage of his band, he was glad that AP decided to pay any attention to them at all. I've decided not to crack the fifth open until Time Again come back to Cleveland and I have an opportunity to share it with them.


Moral: Enjoy your platitudes with as much enthusiasm as you take your beatings. Or just disappear up your own Hershey Highway.

7 Comments    

7 Comments:

Blogger LunarFlame17 said...

I recently saw a blog where somebody claimed that they weren't gonna read AP anymore because you guys gave a bad review to Gwen Stacy's debut album. I just don't understand stuff like that. Reviews are just opinions, yeah? I mean, just because a magazine says that an album I like is bad, does that mean I can no longer enjoy that album? I thought Gwen Stacy's debut was amazing, but that doesn't mean I don't still enjoy this magazine. People have a right to their own opinions. I'm not gonna reject a great magazine just because one reviewer happened to not like an album that I love.

May 29, 2008 7:16 PM  
Blogger Jason Pettigrew said...

Exactly. Reviews are just dialogue. I've had people tell me my personal taste sucks, and every record I give a bad review to, they automatically check out. And I'm TOTALLY fine with that. Thanks for reading! (jp)

May 29, 2008 7:37 PM  
OpenID kyrck87 said...

I've come to realize rather recently that AP is The Bible, for serious. It's the first magazine on top of a stack of other APs in my room (and Vogue, don't judge)- and of course there were awful reviews of an album that I had been playing on repeat in my car for quite some time! What did that tell me about my music taste? Obviously I wasn't going to stop listening to the album, I was hooked, but it definitely helped me expand my music repertoire, to find music on a different part of the spectrum, and it's great! Because without the bad reviews, what is the incentive for a band to push to become great? And without those heart stopping albums the world would be a little less bright.

May 30, 2008 9:27 AM  
Blogger Aaron Burgess said...

Aw, and here I thought this was gonna be a post about Michael Angelo Batio's old band. Don't tease, daddy!

May 30, 2008 11:07 AM  
OpenID weirdgrl1982 said...

You know Mr. Pettigrew, I really do respect you. I have been one of those readers, angrily throwing my AP to the floor in a fit of rage over one review or another. Not so long ago, I sent an email regarding one of the bands you mentioned in this blog and you personally wrote me back! I think that rocks! While I still feel my rant was kinda justified, I'm starting to better understand where you're coming from. While I won't always agree with everyhing printed in your amazing mag, my respect for AP and its staff will never diminish.


As for the certain band that I often defend...maybe you guys should just part ways. If they have gone over the the dark side...er... pop side, maybe you should just leave them out.

May 30, 2008 1:55 PM  
Blogger neveryoumind said...

People get soooooo worked up about reviews! It's like, geeze, it's not like because Jason Pettigrew doesn't like ur favourite band, doesn't mean you should give a flying crap. Obviously, you and Jason Pettigrew have (God forbid) different tastes in music. Get the f**k over it, morons.

July 16, 2008 7:36 PM  
Blogger neveryoumind said...

oh, and I agree with kyrck87: AP is the bible.

July 16, 2008 7:37 PM  

Post a Comment

<< Home