The clearing of the air.
What's up, everyone? It's been a little while. Sorry about the extended hiatus from blogging; I've been officially a Twitter addict for the better part of the past few months, but I promise not to let this blog go to seed anymore. (However, if you want daily ruminations on my mundane life, by all means, please follow me.)
Anyway, I'm writing today because of Daisy. No, not this thing:

This thing:

Brand New's Daisy comes out on Sept. 22, which is in three weeks. Unfortunately, the record leaked this past weekend, sending everyone into a frenzy over who could hear it first -- and along with that, be the first publication or website to review it.
Being the music editor for a national magazine, I'm luckier than most: Publicists are usually able to get us advance music for hotly anticipated albums well before their street dates in hopes that we'll enjoy it enough to want to write about it in our magazine. In this case, I was sent a secure audio stream to Daisy on July 27, nearly two months before the record would hit stores. Due to publication deadlines (and the fact that I was out of the country on vacation through August 4), I was unable to fully absorb Daisy in enough time to accurately write a review for the print edition of AP. Thus, it was worked out with the band's publicist that I could run a web-exclusive review of the album on Sept. 7, a shade over two weeks before its release.
Of course, all that changed with the album leaking, and thus, the publicist contacted me this morning and told me we could run our review as soon as we wanted to, due to the circumstances. While my final draft wasn't done, I was quickly able to re-visit the album to get my thoughts straight, thanks to the leak which I admit to downloading strictly for professional convenience's sake. My review, which was based on roughly a month's worth of absorption (I'd estimate between 40-50 full listens), was published on altpress.com earlier today. Do I think it's the best review I've ever written? Not even close. But do I feel comfortable about it, knowing that I accurately conveyed what I thought were the album's high and low points? You betcha.
Judging by comments left by fans on our website as well as our Facebook and Twitter pages, the response has been mixed; some people agree with me, and some people don't. That's totally fine; music is subjective, and there's no reason you have to agree with someone.
But the reason I'm writing all of this is because of this accusation. I won't really even bother to address it besides to say that he is absolutely wrong in his assessment of how often I've heard the music. One day, maybe that kid will realize he isn't the most important person in the world and not every band, label and publicist kowtows to him -- but I doubt it.
For those of you who have heard Daisy -- even in live videos from YouTube -- what are your thoughts on it thus far? And furthermore, do you think your opinion will change after 10 listens? What about 20? Or 50?
Anyway, I'm writing today because of Daisy. No, not this thing:

This thing:

Brand New's Daisy comes out on Sept. 22, which is in three weeks. Unfortunately, the record leaked this past weekend, sending everyone into a frenzy over who could hear it first -- and along with that, be the first publication or website to review it.
Being the music editor for a national magazine, I'm luckier than most: Publicists are usually able to get us advance music for hotly anticipated albums well before their street dates in hopes that we'll enjoy it enough to want to write about it in our magazine. In this case, I was sent a secure audio stream to Daisy on July 27, nearly two months before the record would hit stores. Due to publication deadlines (and the fact that I was out of the country on vacation through August 4), I was unable to fully absorb Daisy in enough time to accurately write a review for the print edition of AP. Thus, it was worked out with the band's publicist that I could run a web-exclusive review of the album on Sept. 7, a shade over two weeks before its release.
Of course, all that changed with the album leaking, and thus, the publicist contacted me this morning and told me we could run our review as soon as we wanted to, due to the circumstances. While my final draft wasn't done, I was quickly able to re-visit the album to get my thoughts straight, thanks to the leak which I admit to downloading strictly for professional convenience's sake. My review, which was based on roughly a month's worth of absorption (I'd estimate between 40-50 full listens), was published on altpress.com earlier today. Do I think it's the best review I've ever written? Not even close. But do I feel comfortable about it, knowing that I accurately conveyed what I thought were the album's high and low points? You betcha.
Judging by comments left by fans on our website as well as our Facebook and Twitter pages, the response has been mixed; some people agree with me, and some people don't. That's totally fine; music is subjective, and there's no reason you have to agree with someone.
But the reason I'm writing all of this is because of this accusation. I won't really even bother to address it besides to say that he is absolutely wrong in his assessment of how often I've heard the music. One day, maybe that kid will realize he isn't the most important person in the world and not every band, label and publicist kowtows to him -- but I doubt it.
For those of you who have heard Daisy -- even in live videos from YouTube -- what are your thoughts on it thus far? And furthermore, do you think your opinion will change after 10 listens? What about 20? Or 50?





































